February 19, 2013

The Absurdity of Games Part VI

Part 5: Standing still.Part 6: Finding the balance

In the final part of this series, I'll explain that life in Nampula is not always about going forward, it's about making sure your neighbor doesn't move ahead of you. It's about making sure that if you can't get an advantage you put him at a disadvantage. It's about seeing your neighbor and wondering how you get the better of him.

Both the reason and the solution for this enmity towards their fellow man are, I believe, incredibly simple and impossibly difficult. It's all about equilibrium and Jesus.

For those that saw the movie A Beautiful Mind you know all about equilibrium without actually knowing it. There is a scene in the the movie where Russel Crowe's character gets a brilliant inspiration for his career-defining idea when he is in a bar and all his buddies are hitting on the same girl. They are going after the same prize, and nobody is having any success and they are all in danger of going home alone. In a brilliant masterstroke of genius, Russel Crowe invents the concept of the wingman (and get's a Nobel Prize for it). He states that only way that everybody get's a piece of the pie is if they stop trying to prevent the others from eating the whole pie and instead cut it into pieces. His buddies decide to take one for the team and go after the girl's not-as-good-looking friends, leaving Crowe hook up with the pretty one.

The scene in the movie is ridiculous, but illustrates the problem that people face here (not competition over the pretty girl in the bar). The problem is that, in situations like the bar or living in Nampula, no one single person is able to significantly improve their situation because there will always be obstacles—corrupt teachers, cops, doctors, politicians, neighbors, or disease, famine, drought, sickness, death.

When this happens, there are only two things you can do: Cooperate, or compete. The first is working together so everybody is happy. The second is make sure you win, most often by making the other person lose.

In the bar, these solutions are pretty straight forward. You can work together, be the wingman, so everybody gets a piece of the pie.* If you don't choose to work together, your option is to make sure the other doesn't win. This is when you walk up to your friend during the middle of his conversation, and say something like, "Hey, buddy, Nancy has been trying to reach you on your phone. She wants me to tell you to remember that you need to take your herpes medication 30 minutes before eating."**

*I do not approve of doing this, but it is an incredibly ubiquitous example I know you'll all understand.
** I definitely approve of this.

My sabotaging your buddy's hook-up you don't actually win anything. You don't even come out ahead. But what you do is make sure he loses, which is basically a win in your book since every loser needs a winner.

The problem is that most everybody here in Nampula encountered the situation and has achieved equilibrium in which they can no longer move forward my any action of their own. They can't get a job, can't get healthier, can't afford better clothes, can't be happier. The only solutions then is working together (which I've already discussed ad naseum on this blog as being culturally impossible) or you decide to take your neighbor down a notch and thus feel better about your own plight.

When we go in to the water utility to complain that our neighborhood has been without water for over a year, most often the question asked is, "And what would you like me to do about?" This is not polite customer service, this is the attendant at the water utility saying that she couldn't care less about our plight. We ask for a technician to come out and figure out where the breach in the line is our why to explain a reason why our neighborhood isn't getting water. Usually they'll come back with, "I could send somebody out to look at it, but that's very hard because we're all busy. Yes, I know you're an orphanage with dozens of vulnerable children. It's just best to forget about it, there's really nothing I can do."

Does she or any of the countless other people that give us the cold shoulder on a daily basis really benefit or even suffer from our neighborhood finally getting water? Not in the slightest. But because it is seen as a winning outcome for us, she will either want to participate (get a bribe, or "a thanks", for helping) or will want to see us lose, because that way she wins.

That is why we sit at equilibrium, the point in which we are not able to improve our situation (or our collective situations) without the help or cooperation of others. The only thing you have the capability to do is effect somebody else's situation, by either harming or helping them. The difficulty is if you got everybody to work together then, duh, this would be paradise. But people are fallen.

That is why I said the second solution is Jesus. Not because then everybody would work together and nobody would be in want and we'd all sit around the campfire singing kumbaya. But the only way that people are going to avoid loosing is if they properly define what is winning.

I'm am trying for the life of me, we all are, to teach the kids that the people you see, lives surrounded by poverty and injustice and sickness and sin is not the way things were meant to be. But, unfortunately, things are the way things are. If you play by the rules of the world to get the rewards of the world then you must be prepared to also lose according to the world.

That is why these kids need to realize that despite their natural instincts, the rules of the game are completely different. If someone hits you, you don't hit them back to feel better. You turn the other cheek. In my book, that's winning, but how do you explain to a 12 year with the black eye that he is the real victor for not fighting back and puncher has lost more than just an afternoon sitting in "time out".

In our potluck examples, the kids all told me the game was wrong because they thought I won. I won because I finished with the most money. I asked why a certain person didn't win for having brought the most food to share with everybody else. "Because everybody else ate their food, what did they win?"

The idea of winning ingrained as something contrary to what we should believe. When Jesus said that blessed are they that hunger and thirst for righteousness for they will be satisfied, it's because sometimes if you want to live righteously you are going to be hungry and thirsty because you refuse to pay bribes, you pay for your utilities, you don't give in to your teachers demands for money or sex in exchange for passing a class, you don't get a job because you apply honestly, you don't steal when nobody is looking.

We have had kids leave here that have been instructed to steal from the workplace on behalf of their superiors. How do you explain to them that facing the prospect of being fired because they wouldn't comply is nothing compared to hearing, "Well done, good and faithful servant." It is a perspective you can't ever force on a kid, or an adult for that matter.

How do you get a kid to do their homework and admit when they need help rather than decided that the way through life is to cheat on exams and copy homework from your buddies or perform favors for a teacher. How do convince them that doing the right thing is better than doing the profitable thing. How do you show them that being the good Samaritan and loving your neighbor is the commandment when it feels much better to slander your neighbor.

People like instant rewards, even here. People don't like to see that they are better off suffering and being denied water, good grades, building permits, a job opportunity. When there are many people skirting the rules and "winning" it's hard to see how that is not an immediate advantage.

And so that's where things stand here. Its a challenge, especially with the kids, to convince them of living an existential lifestyle, being one where the "rewards" are not necessarily the physical results of getting more money, food, a bigger house, a job, a diploma, friends. The challenge is convincing people it's worth it to put on the new self, live a life walking uprightly and justly and obediently, to love your neighbor instead of mistreating them or denying them the same opportunity you enjoy.

No comments:

Post a Comment